<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Happy Mortal &#187; foucault</title>
	<atom:link href="http://happymortal.com/tag/foucault/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://happymortal.com</link>
	<description>This life, well-lived.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>We are All Mad!:  Black Friday, Nas, and Foucault</title>
		<link>http://happymortal.com/2008/11/we-are-all-mad-black-friday-nas-and-foucault/</link>
		<comments>http://happymortal.com/2008/11/we-are-all-mad-black-friday-nas-and-foucault/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 06:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>willwindow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foucault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hip hop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wal-mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://happymortal.com/?p=353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do Nas' offensives actually have the potential to burn "the media" or do they just fuel the corporate fire?  Did Foucault pave the way for a preface-less world, or did he just put a new mask on it?  I ponder these questions as I ponder the following: <a href="http://happymortal.com/2008/11/we-are-all-mad-black-friday-nas-and-foucault/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="tt-flickr tt-flickr-Small" title="Shootout at the Mall" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/notionscapital/3067713038/"><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3163/3067713038_6b7dde79bb_m.jpg" alt="Shootout at the Mall" width="171" height="240" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/foucault/">Foucault</a> spends most of the two-page preface to <em>The History of Madness</em> (1972) <a href="http://www.sciy.org/blog/_archives/2008/10/30/3955168.html">critiquing</a> the idea of the preface.  His parting words read:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8211;But you just wrote a preface.<br />
&#8211;At least it is short.</p></blockquote>
<p>This hyper-critical nod raises an interesting question.  Can we ever stand fully outside of that which we critique?  True, Foulcault could have written about the tyranny of the preface in the body of his work, but to write about the preface at all is to somehow engage it, touch on it, face it.</p>
<p><a class="tt-flickr tt-flickr-Small" title="High Intensity Debate" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/altemark/168589869/"><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/61/168589869_681522dbae_m.jpg" alt="High Intensity Debate" width="240" height="180" /></a></p>
<p>In Nas&#8217; song, &#8220;<a href="http://www.hiphopshome.com/audio/310/nas-sly-fox-fox-news-diss/">Sly Fox</a>,&#8221; the rapper goes after the Fox News network for . . . well, for being Fox, and gives this line in the third verse:</p>
<blockquote><p>I use Viacom<br />
As my firearm<br />
And let the lyrics split you<br />
Who do you rely upon?</p></blockquote>
<p>While attacking a major news network, Nas willingly admits he relies on another media conglomerate to fire his missiles.  In fact, Nas also raps, &#8220;I turn on CBS and I see BS,&#8221; in spite of the fact that <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081124/wall-street-to-sumner-redstone-please-sell-your-viacom-cbs-shares-and-get-it-over-with/">CBS and Viacom</a> belonged to the same conglomerate until 2006.  Do Nas&#8217; offensives actually have the potential to burn &#8220;the media&#8221; or do they just fuel the corporate fire?  Did Foucault pave the way for a preface-less world, or did he just put a new mask on it?</p>
<p>I ponder these questions as I ponder the following:  What is my investment in American consumerism when I <a href="http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/262842">dry-heave </a>at the news of the man <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-judith-rich/black-friday-at-wal-mart_b_147033.html">trampled </a>to death at Wal-Mart on black friday?</p>
<p><a class="tt-flickr tt-flickr-Medium" title="hp-shopping-blackfriday-2008" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/spierzchala/3068576262/"><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3062/3068576262_985119e90e.jpg" alt="hp-shopping-blackfriday-2008" width="500" height="250" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://happymortal.com/2008/11/we-are-all-mad-black-friday-nas-and-foucault/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

