<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Happy Mortal &#187; DMX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://happymortal.com/tag/dmx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://happymortal.com</link>
	<description>This life, well-lived.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Race, Rape, and Rights:  Sacred Cows in Hip Hop</title>
		<link>http://happymortal.com/2008/11/race-rape-and-rights-sacred-cows-in-hip-hop/</link>
		<comments>http://happymortal.com/2008/11/race-rape-and-rights-sacred-cows-in-hip-hop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>willwindow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiphop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://happymortal.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Requiring a woman to adopt an "understanding" attitude in order to approach a text saturated with male aggression is to perpetuate male aggression.  For it forces her, as a first step, to submit by placing "him" first.  In the case of a discourse about rape, this is violence against her.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="tt-flickr tt-flickr-Small" title="DMX" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/alexindigo/213186765/"><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/95/213186765_02250143f8_m.jpg" alt="DMX" width="192" height="240" /></a></p>
<p>Warning: this post contains lyrics describing violence and sexual assault.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m comin in the house and I&#8217;m gunnin&#8217; for your spouse<br />
Tryin&#8217; to send the bitch back to her maker<br />
And if you got a daughter older then 15, I&#8217;ma rape her<br />
Take her on the living room floor, right there in front of you<br />
Then ask you seriously, whatchu wanna do?<br />
Frustratin&#8217;, isn&#8217;t it? When they kill me, but I&#8217;ma kill you<br />
Now watch me fuck just a lil&#8217; while longer, please, will you?&#8221;</p>
<p>-<a href="http://www.myspace.com/dmx">DMX</a>, from  &#8220;X is Coming,&#8221; on It&#8217;s Dark and Hell is Hot</p>
<p>Today in my friend&#8217;s Hip Hop culture class, discussion ignited over DMX&#8217;s lyrics.  In the midst of a conversation portraying DMX&#8217;s corpus as part of the &#8220;sacred texts&#8221; of Hip Hop, my Caucasian female friend brought up the above lines and questioned whether a community should honor lyrics about the rape of a 15 year old as &#8220;Hip Hop Scripture.&#8221;  One by one various class members brushed her concerns aside, repeating the mantra, &#8220;If you want to understand someone you need to know where they are coming from.&#8221;</p>
<p>When another classmate objected to a woman &#8220;having&#8221; try to understand a person in order to appreciate his oppressive mysogynistic lyrics, a male African American classmate countered, saying, &#8220;It gets messy when you talk about oppression because she is White and DMX is Black.&#8221;</p>
<p>As a white male, I am a complete outsider and insider in this discussion.  I don&#8217;t know what it is like to be Black in the U.S. I also don&#8217;t know what it&#8217;s like to be a woman.  I do know what it is like to be privileged.  However, this discussion raises questions worth exploring.  Should we require everyone to approach a text, like DMX&#8217;s, with understanding first?  Here, I agree with my friend.  No.</p>
<p>Requiring a woman to adopt an &#8220;understanding&#8221; attitude in order to approach a text saturated with male aggression is to perpetuate male aggression.  For it forces her, as a first step, to submit by placing &#8220;him&#8221; first.  In the case of a discourse about rape, this is violence against her.  I would not require a Black individual to approach a racist text with understanding first.  I am not trying to make any statement about whether mysogyny is more oppressive than racism, nor am I saying that a woman&#8211;or any person&#8211;cannot choose to approach violent texts with understanding.  I am only saying that requiring it is wrong.</p>
<p>Lastly, I would never want shrines in Hip Hop, sacred cows that could not be criticized for fear of being called racist.  I can&#8217;t even begin to fathom the pain and oppression that gave birth to DMX&#8217;s songs.  But to treat a person as an ethical equal we must accord them the dignity of sometimes being wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://happymortal.com/2008/11/race-rape-and-rights-sacred-cows-in-hip-hop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
